Their implementation works across the operating system too, which makes it much more valuable to me. Their demo video actually showed an example using Notion. Likewise, I would be okay with paying Raycast $10+/month for their AI, as it’s a solution that can work anywhere (and looks to use newer GPT models). And even still, if I were just paying for me, I feel like $10/month is still a lot for a tool confined to one piece of software. Even if I used NotionAI a lot, I know for a fact my wife won’t. $10/user/month? My wife and I share a workspace. Especially when there are so many (free) alternatives that aren’t too inconvenient, like Edge/Bing, ChatGPT, and now Raycast.įor me, the value proposition doesn’t justify the cost. I don’t do enough content creation in Notion to justify that cost for me. I think I was surprised it cost so much money, I expected it to be more around $3-$5/month. This is not on the same level as adding a feature such as a new API to something like google docs of GitHub. In lamens terms, AI = high cost, and in order to bring this tool to you, they need to cover that high cost.
#NOTION AI REDDIT PC#
If you have ever tried to run an AI model similar to GPT on your personal computer using open-source projects, it becomes immediately clear that your desktop PC is nowhere near capable of running a model like GPT. This requires a significant amount of processing power, as the server needs to analyze vast amounts of data to generate a high-quality response. On the other hand, when processing an AI prompt, the server needs to analyze the prompt, generate a response, and then provide that response back to you. When you save your notion space, the server simply needs to store the data in a database or file storage system, which is a relatively simple task.
It's important to understand that the process of saving your notion space's contents, such as text, images, files, and the structure of your notion space, like pages, properties, and tables, is significantly less computationally taxing on a server when compared to processing an AI prompt to generate a response.
But I feel really let down because I was led to believe that I would be getting a new feature which now turns out to cost more per month than my Notion membership. I understand that it is a new revenue stream for Notion. And that's 20 uses, period, not 20 uses per month. I really felt blindsided when I received notification when Notion AI went live, that it would cost an additional $8.00 per month, and that I only have 20 uses before I have to pay. I do not recall ever seeing or reading anything about it being a paid add-on. Their "Introducing Notion AI" video, the various emails I received soliciting, confirming, and providing information about the Alpha Waitlist, and the entire Alpha testing experience seemed to indicate that this was a going to be a new Notion feature for existing Notion users. I admit that I'm pissed about how Notion AI was finally rolled out. And I absolutely get it that many corporate and educational (and yes, even some hobbyist/side-gig) use cases will view Notion AI an invaluable tool, regardless of cost. I absolutely get it that companies like Notion must continually develop new revenue streams. Since Notion AI was released as a paid add-on, it is now no longer an economically viable tool for me.
#NOTION AI REDDIT PLUS#
TL DR I'm very disappointed that Notion AI is now a paid add-on at a cost higher than the cost of my (grandfathered Plus Plan) Notion membership.Īs a hobbyist and a side-gig Notion user, my use cases for Notion AI are admittedly limited to infrequent and occasional secondary use compared to other Notion features.
0 kommentar(er)
